1.Attention is a critical component in SAS model,the authors think that it`s associated with initiation,so would we make the dimension in our asssessment of Executive Function?
2.Many assessments made based on SAS model are related to "Strategy allocation", such as Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Six Element Test, maybe we could take advantage of them.
3.Do these tests reflect real perdormances of pts in everyday life (Do they have a goog ecological validity)?If not, how can we solve the kind of similar problems in our studies?
訂閱：
張貼留言 (Atom)
1. There're different kinds of attention. If attention is included, the tool will be more complex. Have you find some "executive tools" include attention assessment?
回覆刪除2. What is "strategy allocation"?
3. Have you any ideas to overcome the possible problems of lacking ecological validity?
In addition, please add a "標籤" about 「執行功能評估工具設計原則」，如具備"ecological validity", 設計題庫，電腦適性測驗等。
1. In fact,many EF tests assciated with attetion are like stroop test,Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART, Robertson et al., 1997).
回覆刪除2."Strategy allocation" means the ability of using different strategies to meet different goals. People can identify different rules under varied problems ,and use the appropriate way to solve them.
3.I found some review papers mention that a cooking test is a executive measure which has a good ecological validity,maybe we could make a computer vesion of it,just like cooking games.
回覆刪除